Please Don't Stop the Music: U2: "No Line on the Horizon"

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

U2: "No Line on the Horizon"

By Nathan Powell

U2 released its 12th album on Tuesday called "No Line on the Horizon."

The release comes five years after their last album, "How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb," and 33 years after the band originally formed. Though it may come as a shock, U2 has reinvented itself yet again in "No Line."

Don't get too excited. U2 still sounds like U2; Bono still sounds like Bono. The group's most recent overhaul is more of a side-step than a jump. But there are a few surprises that make this new album quite a bit different from the band's previous work and keep things interesting - if not astonishing.

U2's Web site says the members spent some time in Morocco writing and performing, gathering musical influences to incorporate into the 11 tracks on "No Line."

From the album's sound, it would seem Moroccan music experiments with multiple rhythms, changes of key and various instruments. Every song incorporates each of these departures from U2's previous incarnations.

The track listing pattern on the album evolves from simpler rhythms to upbeat anthems to softer, more emotional hymn-style songs by tracks 10 and 11.

Bono said on the band's Web site this pattern is intentional. The song order is meant to reflect a pilgrimage.

Sound changes pervade every song on the album. In "Unknown Caller," Bono raps, which he does often on "No Line," and then a Queen-style chorus pipes up.

Unlike some other tracks, "Stand Up Comedy" sounds completely unique. In the song, Bono raps (again) "come on you people! Stand up for your love!" The line is followed closely by an intense, Jimmy Page-inspired guitar riff overlaid with echoing vocals that halfheartedly imitate Led Zeppelin's "Dazed and Confused."

"Breathe," the album's 10th track, features an electric guitar competing with a strong keyboard - and winning. But relentless to the end, the keyboard keeps frantically popping up, sounding ridiculously out of place.

U2's 12th album does depart from the group recent rocker style, but it is not shameful to the band's legendary reputation, either. The sound is still distinctly U2. The group simply incorporated a little Moroccan style to mix things up. The album is definitely worth a listen, but not a buy.

1 comment:

Julie LeungMay 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM
Hmmm...I don't think anything will ever live up to Joshua Tree. Maybe Maybe "All You Can't Leave Behind"

I am, however, interested in this Moroccan influence though.

- Julie
ReplyDelete
Replies

Kelli's Critic Manifesto

A critic in today’s society must form an honest and knowledgeable opinion on the subject under review. It is important for a critic to take into account each experience and draw his/her own conclusions without outside interference. Critics should conduct research about the subject and then include important reporting elements within the review.
Critics give society the opportunity to learn the opinions of their peers and reference groups. There are many types of critics that provide us with insight into our likes and dislikes. Food critics provide us with information about new restaurants and often times their reviews could make or break the restaurant’s success. Music critics have the power in informing us the quality of an artist’s music and whether or not we should purchase it. Book and arts critics persuade us to buy a new book or they can demolish it in their review. Every type of critic can either help make the subject under review prosper or hurt them.
With our advanced technology, critics are still relevant because our society still needs a little guidance on what to spend their money on. The role of blogging only helps critics because it is another successful outlet for them to use to get their message across. Society is becoming more dependent on computers and has more access to them than their daily newspaper.

John's Critic Manifesto

Money doesn't grow on trees, and time is always running out. I can't be wasteful.
But at the same time, I want to enjoy myself; there is so much media out there, some of it truly capable of making me a better human being for its inspirational or creative qualities.
So what to do? Use the critic as a "buffer zone."
Read reviews and see if the work was worth its price in someone else's case, instead of mine.
No, whether or not a snot-nosed kid blogger or stuck-up Times writer liked something does not necessarily dictate the caliber of a movie, book, or album. But having their input is certainly better than having none at all.
Besides, not every critic out there is all that different from you. The idea is to read enough reviews by various authors to determine whose voice you trust.
And heck, while you're at it, you might just have some fun. I mean, who doesn't chuckle through a good bashing?
In addition, staying up with reviews at the very least can keep you up-to-date in a field that you're interested in. I'm not afraid to admit that I read video game reviews; all my friends come to we for recommendations, because they know I'm versed in the critical literature of the medium.
Maybe I'm just a penny-pincher, but wouldn't anyone rather have a stranger spend the money to determine that a film is awful?
Maybe I'm just a perfectionist, but wouldn't anyone rather have a critic spend hours reading a terrible book?
Take advantage of the crumple.

Karla's Critic Manifesto

The Internet is an infinite abyss of information. Yes, go ahead and say “thank you Captain Obvious” now.
Anyone is able to have a presence online, no matter how large or small. You are able to leave your mark on something as often as dogs mark their territory. Whether we like it or not, we are currently knee deep in the era of “citizen journalism.”
So, how are we to distinguish between legitimate critics and the pre-pubescent quack poseur? Are critics still relevant?
Anyone can be a critic and everyone is a critic. But at the same time, we are all also consumers. Who exactly should you be listening to?
Criticism, when executed properly, should be an intellectually stimulating and challenging evaluation that answers the ultimate question: is this worth my time and/or my money?
Criticism is honest public relations. While Public Relations professionals promote their clients in any way possible, critics are able to play the role as gatekeepers: they choose what to review and they review it honestly. Love it or hate it, these people have the power to determine the fate of many an author, artist, musician, etc. They give applause when deserved and red cards when fouled.
Most importantly, critics write for the consumer while the pre-pubescent poseur writes purely based on self-interest.
While there may be more “critics” out there than ever now, remember that it is because of all of our technological advances. Blogspot, iReport, Facebook. I mean, do you really trust Ashton Kutcher’s Twitter about the latest New York Times Best Seller?
Here’s my advice: take each review with a grain of salt…even if it is Michiko Kakutani. Trust your own judgments. After all, that’s what makes a good critic in the end.

Gage's Critic Manifesto

The role of a critic is both a privilege and responsibility, and a good one finds the agreement between the two. It is a privilege in that one is able to revel in the arts, mull over their impressions and opinions about their subject and then get paid to write about it. However, it is also their responsibility to see that their particular voice acts as a guide to help the reader find their own thoughts about the matter at hand-- not to spoon feed how they should think about it. A critic's personality is a beautiful and powerful tool that is often abused, hording the focus on the critic rather than the actual review.

This means the critic must do two things. Firstly, for the sake of what is being reviewed, the reviewer's goal must be to critique rather than judge. The process of a review is always constructive, picking out the good and bad from a book or film rather than harping on only one of these traits. While an overarching opinion is necessary for the critic's flow, one should never be swayed into the notion that something is flawless or without any redeeming qualities. Flexing such absolutism is the best way to lose credibility.

Secondly, the critic should present their verdict in a fashion that most intelligent human beings can understand-- ahem, that means you, Times book critics. This is where the critic must be confident, but not condescending. Every publication has a target audience, but a review can stray only so far from the conversational tone before its words fly over the readers' heads.

Bottom line: the critic should never elevate themselves above their subject or audience, but should be working to fan the flame of the publication or genre they are reviewing.

Coming to You Live from JOUR 5590

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

U2: "No Line on the Horizon"

1 comment:

JOUR 5590 Blog List

Blog Archive

Labels

Contributors

Kelli's Critic Manifesto

John's Critic Manifesto

Karla's Critic Manifesto

Gage's Critic Manifesto